<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Glossary &#8211; webmindset</title>
	<atom:link href="https://webmindset.net/category/glossary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://webmindset.net</link>
	<description>Content marketing and Content strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2024 09:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What does &#8220;mass amateurization&#8221; mean?</title>
		<link>https://webmindset.net/mass-amateurization-of/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadreza Shabanali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 04:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Shirky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass amateurization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmindset.net/?p=1633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is the simplest definition of the term: Mass amateurization occurs by removing or weakening the entry barriers to a professional field. However, we should keep in mind that Clay [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/mass-amateurization-of/">What does &#8220;mass amateurization&#8221; mean?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the simplest definition of the term:</p>
<blockquote><p>Mass amateurization occurs by removing or weakening the entry barriers to a professional field.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, we should keep in mind that Clay Shirky has used the notion to address an emerging trend in the media.</p>
<p>He describes the trend as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230;Most professions exist because there is a scarce resource that requires ongoing management.</p>
<p>&#8230;Our social tools remove older obstacles to public expression and thus remove the bottlenecks that characterized mass media.  The result is the mass amateurization of efforts previously reserved for media professionals.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Mass amateurization diminishes what he calls “professionalism.” In his view, professionals often enforce strict and difficult-to-achieve standards in their profession, not only to maintain high work quality but also to protect their turf from amateurs.</p>
<p>It’s no longer necessary to be a professional photographer for your work to be noticed. Even for a non-professional, far-from-standard photo, there will always be some audience. The reality is even more bitter for professionals: Their work may no longer get noticed, as it might become buried forever under millions of photos taken and shared by amateur photographers.</p>
<p>The same trend holds true for other types of content, including but not limited to articles, podcasts, and ebooks.</p>
<h2>Who coined the term &#8220;mass amateurization&#8221;</h2>
<p>In some textbooks and articles, I have seen references to <a href="https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/16299/Wolske%2cJohnson%2cAdams-CIRN2009.pdf?sequence=2&amp;isAllowed=y">Wolske, Johnson, &amp; Adams (2009)</a>. They titled their paper: &#8220;Citizen Professional Toolkits: Empowering Communities Through Mass Amateurization.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, Clay Shirky&#8217;s book <em>Here Comes Everybody</em> was published a year before the above-mentioned paper. Therefore, although Wolske and his colleagues did not mention Shirky&#8217;s name, the credit belongs to him.</p>
<h2>Mass Amateurization and Media</h2>
<p>Shirky has titled the third chapter of his book &#8220;Everyone Is a Media Outlet.&#8221; He believes that effortless publishing leads to many more outlets, and the news provided by media will get diluted in this ever-deepening pool of content.</p>
<p>He describes the effect of mass amateurization on the media (specifically the news industry) in a brief yet convincing statement:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>[news will change from an] institutional prerogative to news as part of a communications ecosystem.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/clay-shirky-internet.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1634" src="http://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/clay-shirky-internet.jpg" alt="Clay Shirky and the mass amateurization of publishing" width="612" height="612" srcset="https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/clay-shirky-internet.jpg 612w, https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/clay-shirky-internet-150x150.jpg 150w, https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/clay-shirky-internet-300x300.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 612px) 100vw, 612px" /></a></p>
<div class="wpcm-subscribe"><a href="javascript:void(0);"  class="wpcm-wrapper-link" data-get-id="1633">Read Mode</a></div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/mass-amateurization-of/">What does &#8220;mass amateurization&#8221; mean?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An evergreen tweet</title>
		<link>https://webmindset.net/an-evergreen-tweet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadreza Shabanali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 08:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evergreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evergreen Tweet]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmindset.net/?p=2102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Social media is not usually considered as a suitable platform for evergreen content. Because every post is quickly buried under dozens of activities and newer contents. In fact, Twitter is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/an-evergreen-tweet/">An evergreen tweet</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Social media is not usually considered as a suitable platform for <a href="http://webmindset.net/evergreen-content-may-need-content-strategy/">evergreen content</a>. Because every post is quickly buried under dozens of activities and newer contents. In fact, Twitter is the worst case among other social tools as even a one-day-old tweet feels like an old age content there.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So just to feed my curiosity, googled &#8220;evergreen tweet&#8221; to become sure that the term &#8220;evergreen tweet&#8221; is an oxymoron. But I was wrong. A tweet from Bernie Sanders was considered as an <strong><em>evergreen tweet </em></strong>by most media. A three-word-tweet about the AHCA:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2103" src="http://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/evergreen-tweet.gif" alt="Evergreen Tweet Example" width="800" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Such a tweet can be considered as a vivid description of the current state of the politics without considering any specific context, even beyond the United States political landscape.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">So it seems that I&#8217;ve to change my mind about the term &#8220;evergreen tweet&#8221;. Most descriptions of the politics can be considered timeless and evergreen, especially if they are talking about corruption, incompetence, and disgrace.</p>
<div class="wpcm-subscribe"><a href="javascript:void(0);"  class="wpcm-wrapper-link" data-get-id="2102">Read Mode</a></div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/an-evergreen-tweet/">An evergreen tweet</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Subscriber Acquisition Cost (SAC)</title>
		<link>https://webmindset.net/subscriber-acquisition-cost-sac/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadreza Shabanali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription business model]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmindset.net/?p=2295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Subscriber Acquisition Cost (SAC) is one of the most critical KPIs in any subscription-based business model. SAC is one of the major factors in your cost structure and a good [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/subscriber-acquisition-cost-sac/">What is Subscriber Acquisition Cost (SAC)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Subscriber Acquisition Cost (SAC) is one of the most critical KPIs in any <a href="http://webmindset.net/subscription-revenue-model-definition-examples/">subscription-based business model</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">SAC is one of the major factors in your cost structure and a good leverage point to think about when designing or optimizing your business model.</p>
<h2>Definition of the Subscriber Acquisition Cost</h2>
<p>As the name suggests, SAC is the cost of acquiring a new subscriber for your business.</p>
<p>In other words, <strong style="font-style: italic;">subscriber acquisition cost is</strong> <em><strong>the average cost of adding one subscriber to your subscriber base.</strong></em></p>
<h2>Calculation of the Subscriber Acquisition Cost</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Usually, you have to specify a reference period and calculate SAC over it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Many sources suggest you to choose the reference period based on your shortest subscription interval. For example, if the monthly subscription is your shortest offer, you might consider the last 30 days leading up to today as a basis for SAC calculation.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, if you are looking for a reliable indicator, such a time interval would not be accurate enough, as most of your costs spread over longer timespans. Most of the marketing campaigns last a couple of months and many marketing services (such as email marketing tools) offer quarterly and yearly services.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Therefore, I do suggest to check the frequency of the costs incurred by your marketing efforts and choose your calculation period based on your marketing and advertising cash flow.</p>
<h2>SAC Depends on Your Business Scale</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The subscriber acquisition cost depends heavily on your business scale. Thus you are not able to predict it for long-term if you have scale-up plans in mind.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Usually, SAC will be reduced after you scale-up your business. However, in mature and competitive markets, SAC might be increased as your business grows. Because instead of converting non-customers to customers, you have to convince subscribers of the other businesses to accept the switching costs and turn into your customer.</p>
<h2>Subscription Acquisition Costs in Different Industries</h2>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You have to be careful in benchmarking your SAC against other businesses and industries.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here are some of the reasons that such comparisons can be misleading:</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;">SAC depends on the business model and you cannot compare the SACs in a vacuum.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Some of the acquisition channels are cheaper than their alternatives, but their&#8217;s subscriber lifetime would shorter or churn rates would be higher. So you may have higher SAC comparing to your competitor, but still be more profitable because of the higher retention rate.</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">SAC depends on the age of the businesses and awareness of the brand in the market and among the people you are trying to reach. So you can&#8217;t compare SAC of a fresh company with the one which is working for a couple of months and years.</li>
</ul>
<div class="wpcm-subscribe"><a href="javascript:void(0);"  class="wpcm-wrapper-link" data-get-id="2295">Read Mode</a></div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/subscriber-acquisition-cost-sac/">What is Subscriber Acquisition Cost (SAC)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content Optimization</title>
		<link>https://webmindset.net/content-optimization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadreza Shabanali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmindset.net/?p=1584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Definition of content optimization Content Optimization (CO) is a subset of SEO helping you to audit/edit your content and make it more appealing to search engines. Of course, the tools [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/content-optimization/">Content Optimization</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Definition of content optimization</strong></h3>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Content Optimization (CO) is a subset of SEO helping you to audit/edit your content and make it more appealing to search engines.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Of course, the tools and technics used for content optimization depend on the content type. However, you can consider the following subcategories of the content optimization as the most important ones:</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Article optimization</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Image optimization</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Video optimization</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Link optimization</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">News optimization</li>
<li style="text-align: justify;">Product review optimization</li>
</ul>
<p><em><strong>Further reading: </strong></em><a href="http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/">Content Marketing Institute</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://contentmarketinginstitute.com/2013/09/guide-content-optimization-key-content-types/">guide to content optimization</a> is a good starting point if you&#8217;d like to know more about this topic.</p>
<p><em><strong>Note:</strong></em> Do not confuse the content optimization technics with similar topics such as landing page optimization. Although these concepts are equally important, the former is about attracting more organic traffic while the latter is concerned with conversion rate. Sometimes these two dimensions are aligned with each other, however, there are many cases in which, there is an inevitable trade-off between them.</p>
<div class="wpcm-subscribe"><a href="javascript:void(0);"  class="wpcm-wrapper-link" data-get-id="1584">Read Mode</a></div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/content-optimization/">Content Optimization</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Meaning of Lizard Brain &#124; Do we really have lizard and monkey brains?</title>
		<link>https://webmindset.net/the-lizard-brain/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mohammadreza Shabanali]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lizard brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[om]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webmindset.net/?p=1562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lizard Brain is the term used in popular psychology and personal development, referring to the older parts of the brain. In non-technical language, the lizard brain, supposed to be the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/the-lizard-brain/">The Meaning of Lizard Brain | Do we really have lizard and monkey brains?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lizard Brain</em> is the term used in popular psychology and personal development, referring to the older parts of the brain. In non-technical language, the lizard brain, supposed to be the very primitive part of the brain common between reptiles and mammals, is considered responsible for basic survival functions such as breathing and fight or flight response.</p>
<p>The <em>lizard brain</em> is commonly contrasted with the <em>mouse </em>and <em>monkey brains</em>. While the former represents the part of the human brain responsible for memory and emotion, the latter denotes the newer part of the brain, capable of complex cognitive functions and higher-order thinking.</p>
<p>The following diagram depicts this so-called <em>triune model of the brain</em> (<a href="https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/NICABM-Brain-Infographic.pdf">+</a>):</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2413" src="https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/lizard-brain-model.gif" alt="What is lizard brain" width="1312" height="744" /></p>
<p>No matter how close to reality, this simplified divided model of the brain has been attractive for authors of management, psychology, and personal development books. For example, Seth Godin, the well-known business writer, has used the term extensively in his book <em>Linchpin.</em> Here are a few samples:</p>
<ul>
<li>Everyone has a little voice inside of their head that&#8217;s angry and afraid. The voice is the resistance, your lizard brain, and it wants you to be average (and safe).</li>
<li>The lizard brain is hungry, scared, and horny.</li>
<li>The lizard brain will fight (to the death) if it has to, but would rather run away.</li>
<li>The lizard brain is not merely a concept. It&#8217;s real, and it&#8217;s living on the top of your spine, fighting for your survival.</li>
</ul>
<p>John Medina, the author of the best-selling book <em>Brain Rules, </em>is also comfortable with using the term &#8220;lizard brain&#8221;<em>:</em></p>
<div class="su-quote su-quote-style-default su-quote-has-cite"><div class="su-quote-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim">Your most ancient neural structure is the brain stem, or &#8220;lizard brain.&#8221; This rather insulting label reflects the fact that the brain stem functions the same in you as in a Gila monster. The brain stem controls most of your body&#8217;s housekeeping chores. Its neurons regulate breathing, heart rate, sleeping, and waking.<span class="su-quote-cite"> John Medina</span></div></div>
<h2>Criticism of the model: lizard brain, mouse brain, and monkey brain</h2>
<p>Lisa Feldman Barret, the well-known and respected neuroscientist, the author of various academic books, and chief editor of <em>The Emotion Review journal</em>, has criticised this model in simple words understandable for the non-technical audience.</p>
<p>In her book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B081TT1V8M/"><em>Seven and a Half Lessons About the Brain</em></a>, Barret describes the model as &#8220;one of the most successful and widespread errors in all of science.&#8221;</p>
<p>Look at the following passage from her book:</p>
<div class="su-note"  style="border-color:#dbdbdb;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;"><div class="su-note-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim" style="background-color:#f5f5f5;border-color:#ffffff;color:#000000;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s certainly a compelling story, and at times, it captures how we feel in daily life.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For example, when your taste buds are tempted by a luscious slice of velvety chocolate cake but you decline it because, honestly, you just finished breakfast, it&#8217;s easy to believe that your impulsive inner lizard and your emotional limbic system pushed you in a cake-ward direction, and your rational neocortex wrestled the pair into submission.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But human brains don&#8217;t work that way. Bad behavior doesn&#8217;t come from ancient and unbridled inner beasts. Good behavior is not the result of rationality. And rationality and emotion are not at war . . . they do not even live in separate parts of the brain.</p>
</div></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Barret tells the story behind this model and the way it got traction and survived till now. A physician named Paul MacLean has visually inspected the brains of lizards and mammals, including humans, and concluded that part of these brains is similar. He considered it as the old part, shaped in the early stages of evolution, and responsible for basic survival functions. In such a model, the human brain has extra parts sitting over this old brain, which evolved in later stages of evolution, responsible for complex cognitive functions.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s the better description of the brain&#8217;s structure? Barret tells us that:</p>
<div class="su-note"  style="border-color:#dbdbdb;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;"><div class="su-note-inner su-u-clearfix su-u-trim" style="background-color:#f5f5f5;border-color:#ffffff;color:#000000;border-radius:5px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">Brains are not evolved in layers and are not designed to allow rationality to conquer our animalistic urges and emotions.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Brains evolved increasingly elaborate sensory and motor systems while budgeting the energy resources of increasingly complex bodies.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For example, one single region of the mouse brain, most likely expanded and subdivided to redistribute its responsibilities as our ancestors evolved larger brains and bodies. This arrangement among brain regions — segregating and then integrating — creates a more complex brain that can control a larger and more complex body.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It&#8217;s a tricky business to compare the brains of different species to discover what is similar, because the path of evolution is twisty and unpredictable.</p>
</div></div>
<h2>Why lizard&#8217;s brain is attractive to authors, coaches and mentors?</h2>
<p>Most of the courses, classes and discussions about behavioral modification and emotion regulation revolve around a fundamental yet essential point: &#8220;You must monitor your first reactions and manage your impulses.&#8221; Or in other words: &#8220;Think twice before any judgment or doing anything.&#8221; This recommendation is crucial, and authors and coaches prefer to reinforce it with scientific evidence. Thus, instead of simply saying, &#8220;Beware of impulsive behavior,&#8221; they like to put it beside &#8220;scientific&#8221; pieces of evidence. Neuroscience is an attractive and persuasive term, and why not use these kinds of pseudo-neuroscientific descriptions as support for our recommendations?</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2420" src="https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/the-lizard-brain-model.jpg" alt="Lizard Brain Definition" width="1312" height="744" srcset="https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/the-lizard-brain-model.jpg 1312w, https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/the-lizard-brain-model-300x170.jpg 300w, https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/the-lizard-brain-model-1024x581.jpg 1024w, https://webmindset.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/the-lizard-brain-model-768x436.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1312px) 100vw, 1312px" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Is it wrong to use this term? No. This simplified model can be helpful in teaching. The term lizard brain is much shorter and more understandable than &#8220;all fast emotional conservative automatic responses of the human brain.&#8221; But we have to remember and remind that we are not talking about the brain&#8217;s actual structure, and it&#8217;s just a metaphor.</p>
<div class="wpcm-subscribe"><a href="javascript:void(0);"  class="wpcm-wrapper-link" data-get-id="1562">Read Mode</a></div><p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net/the-lizard-brain/">The Meaning of Lizard Brain | Do we really have lizard and monkey brains?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://webmindset.net">webmindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
